{"id":1263,"date":"2012-07-03T12:44:00","date_gmt":"2012-07-03T10:44:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/2012\/07\/03\/einsteinov-vztah-k-naboenstvu-1\/"},"modified":"2012-07-03T12:44:00","modified_gmt":"2012-07-03T10:44:00","slug":"einsteinov-vztah-k-naboenstvu-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/2012\/07\/03\/einsteinov-vztah-k-naboenstvu-1\/","title":{"rendered":"Einsteinov vztah k n\u00e1bo\u017eenstvu (1)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\" alignleft size-full wp-image-226\" style=\"float: left;\" alt=\"einstein\" src=\"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2006\/07\/einstein.jpg\" height=\"160\" width=\"120\" \/><strong>I. D\u011bjiny \u0161peci\u00e1lnovedn\u00e9ho pozn\u00e1vania maj\u00fa dialektick\u00fd charakter. Najz\u00e1kladnej\u0161ie aspekty jeho v\u00fdvoja adekv\u00e1tne postihuj\u00fa z\u00e1kony materialistickej dialektiky. Dialektick\u00fd charakter v\u00fdvoja \u0161peci\u00e1lnovedn\u00e9ho poznania sa okrem in\u00e9ho prejavuje najma vo vn\u00fatornej protire\u010divosti nov\u00e9ho a star\u00e9ho poznania, ale aj vo vn\u00fatornej jednote kontinuity a diskontinuity s celkov\u00fdm jeho syntetick\u00fdm rastom.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p> <!--more--> <\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">V\u011bdci pracuj\u00faci v jednotliv\u00fdch pr\u00edrodov\u011bdn\u00fdch a spolo\u010densk\u00fdch v\u00e9d\u00e1ch prij\u00edmaj\u00fa nov\u00e9 poznanie pom\u011brn\u011b zlo\u017eito. T\u00fdka sa to na jednej stran\u011b vedcov-pr\u00edvr\u017eencov star\u0161\u00edch teoretick\u00fdch n\u00e1zorov, v ktor\u00fdch \u010dinnosti pretrv\u00e1va ur\u010dit\u00e1 zotrva\u010dnost, na druhej stran\u011b vystupuj\u00fa do popredia rozli\u010dn\u00e9 snahy o sv\u011bton\u00e1zorov\u00e9 dom\u00fd\u0161lanie nov\u00e9ho poznania. V tejto s\u00favislosti je velmi agiln\u00e1 najma nov\u0161ia n\u00e1bo\u017eensk\u00e1 filozofia, usiluj\u00faca sa n\u011bjako \u201eakceptovat&#8220; nov\u00e9 poznanie v jeho modifikovanej interpret\u00e1cii, aby sa dalo podriad\u00e1\u0165 nedosiahnutelnej, ale takej \u017eelanej \u201eharmonii n\u00e1bo\u017eenskej viery s vedou&#8220;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tak\u00e9to snahy sa prejavovali vo\u010di v\u0161etk\u00fdm nov\u00fdm teoretick\u00fdm iniciat\u00edvam minulosti, ale predov\u0161etk\u00fdm to plat\u00ed o s\u00fa\u010dasn\u00fdch teoretick\u00fdch pr\u00ednosoch. Ani v\u00fdsledky vedeckej \u010dinnosti Alberta Einsteina nie s\u00fa od toho u\u0161etren\u00e9. Viacer\u00ed filozofi, filozofick\u00e9 \u0161koly a smery sa usiluj\u00fa po svojom vysv\u011btlit a sveton\u00e1zorovo vyu\u017eit \u2014 presnej\u0161ie povedan\u00e9 zneu\u017eit \u2014 v\u00fdsledky teoretickej pr\u00e1ce A. Einsteina.(1) Existuj\u00fa naozaj po\u010detn\u00e9 a r\u00f3znorod\u00e9 snahy vysv\u011btlit teoretick\u00fd \u0161peci\u00e1lnovedn\u00fd pr\u00ednos A. Einsteina v duchu toho-ktor\u00e9ho filozofick\u00e9ho syst\u00e9mu. V s\u00fa\u010dasnosti je to z ur\u010dit\u00e9ho hladiska prirodzen\u00e9. 20. storo\u010die je obdob\u00edm neoby\u010dajne prudk\u00e9ho rozvoja vedeck\u00e9ho poznania, zrodu nov\u00fdch fundament\u00e1lnych teori\u00ed. Preto je samozrejm\u00e9, \u017ee v snahe zdovod\u0148ova\u0165 adekv\u00e1tnos\u0165 a spr\u00e1vnost toho-ktor\u00e9ho filozofick\u00e9ho syst\u00e9mu vznikaj\u00fa pr\u00edslu\u0161n\u00e9 interpret\u00e1cie z\u00e1kladn\u00fdch teoretick\u00fdch poznatkov. A. Einstein dobre poznal diela predstavitelov klasickej filozofie, ale aj nov\u0161\u00edch filozofick\u00fdch pr\u00fadov. Svoje odmietav\u00e9 stanovisko k idealizmu, ale rovnako aj k mechanick\u00e9mu materializmu vyjadril vo viacer\u00fdch svojich \u010dl\u00e1nkoch.(2) \u017divelne sa dostal na poz\u00edcie materializmu, ktor\u00fd v\u0161ak, pochopitelne, nebol dialektickomaterialistick\u00fd. Z\u00e1kladn\u00fdm \u010dinitelom, ktor\u00fd ur\u010doval t\u00fato jeho sv\u011bton\u00e1zorov\u00e1 orient\u00e1ciu, bola povaha a obsah jeho \u0161peci\u00e1lnovednej pr\u00e1ce. Duch tejto pr\u00e1ce je materialistick\u00fd a je v rozpore s najrozli\u010dnej\u0161\u00edmi pokusmi o jeho idealistick\u00e9 interpret\u00e1cie, o ktor\u00e9 sa usilovali idealistick\u00ed filozofi 20. storo\u010dia.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">N\u00e1bo\u017eensk\u00e9 pr\u00edstupy k Einsteinovej relativistickej fyzike vych\u00e1dzaj\u00fa z jej rozmanit\u00fdch idealistick\u00fdch interpret\u00e1cii. Je to dan\u00e9 t\u00fdm, \u017ee sa nemo\u017eu oprie\u0165 o Einsteinove filozofick\u00e9 n\u00e1zory. A to preto, ako sme u\u017e uviedli, \u017ee Einstein stoj\u00ed na materialistickom stanovisku. Aj ke\u010f je to materializmus nedosledn\u00fd a nie v\u017edy prec\u00edzne terminologicky formulovan\u00fd. A nav\u00fd\u0161e odmietav\u00e9 stanovisko A. Einsteina k n\u00e1bo\u017eenstvu, jeho \u00falohe a miestu v spolo\u010dnosti s\u00fa velmi jasn\u00e9 a zn\u00e1me. Preto nie div, \u017ee katolicky teoretik E. Schillebeeck zariadili A. Einsteina medzi v\u00fdznamn\u00fdch kritikov n\u00e1bo\u017eenstva, ke\u010f nap\u00edsal: \u201eAni jeden veriaci sa nemo\u017ee v 20. storo\u010d\u00ed tv\u00e1ri\u0165 tak, akoby nebolo do\u0161lo k legitimnej kritike n\u00e1bo\u017eenstva (\u010di u\u017e priamo, alebo z povahy veci) u Freuda, Marxa, Durkheima \u010di Einsteina.&#8220; (3) Uveden\u00e9 vyjadrenie je velmi jasn\u00e9. No ke\u010f\u017ee existuje veta idealistick\u00fdch sn\u00e1h o \u201einterpret\u00e1ciu&#8220; v\u00fdsledkov relativistickej fyziky a ur\u010dit\u00e1 Einsteinova terminologick\u00e1 \u201enedisciplinovanos\u0165&#8220;, v laickom v\u011bdom\u00ed sa \u010dasto prejavuje n\u00e1zor, \u017ee Einstein bol n\u00e1bo\u017eensky veriaci \u010dlov\u011bk. Pok\u00fasime sa uvies\u0165 niektor\u00e9 z\u00e1kladn\u00e9 aspekty a s\u00favislosti Einsteinov\u00fdch filozofick\u00fdch n\u00e1zorov a jeho vztah k n\u00e1bo\u017eenstvu.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Pokra\u010dov\u00e1n\u00ed<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I. D\u011bjiny \u0161peci\u00e1lnovedn\u00e9ho pozn\u00e1vania maj\u00fa dialektick\u00fd charakter. Najz\u00e1kladnej\u0161ie aspekty jeho v\u00fdvoja adekv\u00e1tne postihuj\u00fa z\u00e1kony materialistickej dialektiky. Dialektick\u00fd charakter v\u00fdvoja \u0161peci\u00e1lnovedn\u00e9ho<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":226,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[6],"tags":[241,39],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1263"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1263"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1263\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/226"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1263"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1263"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1263"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}