{"id":260,"date":"2008-12-26T13:53:52","date_gmt":"2008-12-26T12:53:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/2008\/12\/26\/obraz-nmce-a-nmecka-8\/"},"modified":"2008-12-26T13:53:52","modified_gmt":"2008-12-26T12:53:52","slug":"obraz-nmce-a-nmecka-8","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/2008\/12\/26\/obraz-nmce-a-nmecka-8\/","title":{"rendered":"OBRAZ N\u011aMCE A N\u011aMECKA \u2026 (8)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p align=\"justify\"> <img loading=\"lazy\" class=\" alignleft size-full wp-image-3\" src=\"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/10\/logo.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"logo\" title=\"logo\" hspace=\"5\" vspace=\"5\" width=\"100\" height=\"65\" align=\"left\" \/>N\u011bmeck\u00e1 okupace \u010desk\u00fdch zem\u00ed 15. 3. 1939 neb\u00fdval\u00e9 pos\u00edlila protin\u011bmeck\u00fd komponent nacionalismu \u010desk\u00e9ho obyvatelstva.  <\/p>\n<p> <!--more--> <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Aktivistick\u00e9 postul\u00e1ty o \u010desk\u00e9 vin\u011b za 15. b\u0159ezen 1939, o N\u011bmci jako revolu\u010dn\u00edm evropeiz\u00e1toru \u010desk\u00e9ho n\u00e1roda nebyly v\u011bt\u0161inou \u010desk\u00e9 spole\u010dnosti jako nev\u011brohodn\u00e9 p\u0159ij\u00edm\u00e1ny. Naopak, po osobn\u00edm kontaktu s n\u011bmeck\u00fdmi okupanty z III. \u0159\u00ed\u0161e v letech 1939 &#8211; 1940, vyst\u0159\u00edzliv\u011bli i ti \u010ce\u0161i, kte\u0159\u00ed byli nositeli gentlemansk\u00e9ho obrazu \u0159\u00ed\u0161sk\u00e9ho N\u011bmce.<br \/> V \u201eProvol\u00e1n\u00ed dom\u00e1c\u00edho odboje k \u0159\u00ed\u0161sk\u00fdm N\u011bmc\u016fm&quot; z dubna 1940 se konstatovalo: \u201eJste tu u n\u00e1s v Praze a Bratislav\u011b prvn\u00ed rok a t\u011bch \u010cechoslov\u00e1k\u016f, kte\u0159\u00ed si v\u00e1\u017e\u00ed n\u011bmeck\u00e9ho n\u00e1roda, kte\u0159\u00ed v\u011b\u0159\u00ed jeho slib\u016fm, v \u010destnost jeho slova a v ryt\u00ed\u0159skost n\u011bmeck\u00e9 povahy, t\u011bch, kte\u0159\u00ed v\u011b\u0159\u00ed Va\u0161im obvin\u011bn\u00edm prezidenta Bene\u0161e, u\u017e nen\u00ed. Jak\u00e1 je toho p\u0159\u00ed\u010dina? Mysl\u00edte, \u017ee zahrani\u010dn\u00ed nebo podzemn\u00ed propaganda? Nikoliv, jsou to Va\u0161e \u010diny.&#8220; Zcizov\u00e1n\u00edm \u010deskoslovensk\u00e9ho majetku, brut\u00e1ln\u00ed perzekuc\u00ed, germanizac\u00ed, bezohledn\u00fdm znect\u011bn\u00edm \u010desk\u00fdch kulturn\u00edch, historick\u00fdch a st\u00e1tn\u00edch tradic, uct\u00edv\u00e1n\u00edm \u201edu\u0161evn\u011b a t\u011blesn\u011b \u00fachyln\u00e9ho nevzd\u011blan\u00e9ho v\u016fdce&quot; N\u011bmci pr\u00fd dos\u00e1hli toho, \u017ee \u201eslovo N\u011bmec ztratilo dobr\u00fd zvuk,&quot; nen\u00ed synonymem pro \u201ekulturn\u00ed evropsk\u00fd n\u00e1rod XX. stolet\u00ed&quot;, ale synonymem pro zlod\u011bje, lupi\u010de, vraha&quot; &#8211; vinn\u00edka \u010desk\u00e9ho utrpen\u00ed. (60) Chronicky negativn\u00ed obraz \u010desk\u00e9ho N\u011bmce se po 15. b\u0159eznu 1939 nad\u00e1le dramaticky vyost\u0159il. \u010ce\u0161i v protektor\u00e1tu m\u011bli v pam\u011bti dal\u0161\u00ed \u00fa\u010delov\u00e9 p\u0159edstaven\u00ed \u010desk\u00fdch N\u011bmc\u016f v b\u0159eznov\u00fdch dnech 1939, kdy se N\u011bmci v druh\u00e9 republice stylizovali do role ob\u011bt\u00ed \u201e\u010desk\u00e9 rozb\u011bsn\u011bn\u00e9 krve\u017e\u00edzniv\u00e9 l\u016fzy.&quot; Sudeton\u011bmeck\u00e1 elita, za\u010dlen\u011bn\u00e1 po Mnichovu do NSDAP, pokl\u00e1dala likvidaci \u010cSR za sv\u00e9 v\u00edt\u011bzstv\u00ed nad \u010cechy v tis\u00edcilet\u00e9m nacion\u00e1ln\u00edm z\u00e1pase. Od r. 1938 iniciativn\u011b p\u0159ipravovali radik\u00e1ln\u00ed n\u00e1vrhy na rozdroben\u00ed jednoty \u00fazem\u00ed \u010desk\u00fdch zem\u00ed mezi n\u011bmeck\u00e9 zem\u011b a oblasti, na kone\u010dnou germanizaci \u010deskomoravsk\u00e9ho prostoru a vys\u00eddlen\u00ed \u010cech\u016f. (61) P\u0159i uskute\u010d\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed t\u011bchto n\u00e1vrh\u016f \u017e\u00e1dala na vedouc\u00edch \u0159\u00ed\u0161sk\u00fdch m\u00edstech pro k\u00e1dry \u010desk\u00fdch N\u011bmc\u016f p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161n\u00e9 kompetence, nebo\u0165 jsou \u201e\u00fato\u010dn\u00ed&quot; a v kontaktu s \u010cechy \u201ezku\u0161en\u00ed.&quot; (62) Po okupaci se mnoz\u00ed \u010de\u0161t\u00ed N\u011bmci usazovali v protektor\u00e1tu, nebo\u0165 m\u011bli p\u0159edstavu, \u017ee se p\u0159ed nimi otev\u00edr\u00e1 snadn\u00e1 kari\u00e9ra. T\u0159icet tis\u00edc sudetsk\u00fdch N\u011bmc\u016f bylo um\u00edst\u011bno v protektor\u00e1tn\u00ed n\u011bmeck\u00e9 i tzv. autonomn\u00ed spr\u00e1v\u011b, v\u011bt\u0161inou ve st\u0159edn\u00edm a ni\u017e\u0161\u00edm \u010dl\u00e1nku, kter\u00fd p\u0159ich\u00e1zel s \u010desk\u00fdm obyvatelstvem nejv\u00edce do kontaktu.  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> V\u00fdznamn\u00fd byl i pod\u00edl \u010desk\u00fdch N\u011bmc\u016f na \u00e1rizaci \u010desk\u00e9ho majetku. Z p\u0159edstavitele \u010desk\u00fdch N\u011bmc\u016f K. H. Franka, jen\u017e st\u00e1l na vrcholu okupa\u010dn\u00ed hierarchie v protektor\u00e1tu, se stal symbol nacistick\u00fdch proti\u010desk\u00fdch exces\u016f nejenom u \u010desk\u00fdch odboj\u00e1\u0159\u016f, ale i u ofici\u00e1ln\u00edho kolabora\u010dn\u00edho h\u00e1chovsk\u00e9ho okruhu. Skute\u010dnost, \u017ee K. H. Frank byl sp\u00ed\u0161e nacistick\u00fdm \u0159\u00ed\u0161skon\u011bmeck\u00fdm exponentem ve veden\u00ed p\u0159edmnichovsk\u00e9 SdP, nebyla zn\u00e1ma \u010di doce\u0148ov\u00e1na. Zden\u011bk Bo\u0159ek Dohalsk\u00fd informoval z Prahy E. Bene\u0161e: \u201eV\u0161e, co p\u0159i\u0161lo z Berl\u00edna, je realizov\u00e1no se v\u0161\u00ed surovost\u00ed pr\u00e1v\u011b sudetsk\u00fdmi N\u011bmci. Studenty st\u0159\u00edleli sudet\u0161t\u00ed ordne\u0159i. Popravy, konfiskace, \u017eal\u00e1\u0159ov\u00e1n\u00ed prov\u00e1d\u00ed Frank, sudetsk\u00fd N\u011bmec. Nejv\u011bt\u0161\u00ed zv\u011brstva v Sudetech prov\u00e1d\u011bli tamn\u00ed N\u011bmci. Kr\u00e1de\u017ee nejv\u00edce organizuj\u00ed sudet\u0161t\u00ed N\u011bmci.&quot; V z\u00e1v\u011bru depe\u0161e varoval E. Bene\u0161e p\u0159ed vyjedn\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00edm s exilov\u00fdmi \u010desk\u00fdmi N\u011bmci a p\u0159ed jejich za\u010dlen\u011bn\u00edm do exilov\u00fdch \u010ds. st\u00e1tn\u00edch struktur. \u201eTo by dnes p\u0159i st\u00e1l\u00fdch nev\u00fdslovn\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edko\u0159\u00edch od Sude\u0165an\u016f vedlo k rozpadnut\u00ed n\u00e1roda&#8230; lid by to nepochopil a tou\u017eil by pak po federaci s Ruskem.&quot; (63)  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> \u010cesk\u00e9 p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010den\u00ed o naprost\u00e9 identifikaci \u010desk\u00fdch N\u011bmc\u016f s nacismem posilovala slabost protinacistick\u00e9ho sudeton\u011bmeck\u00e9ho odboje, o n\u011bm\u017e nadto \u010ce\u0161i nem\u011bli dostatek konkr\u00e9tn\u00edch zpr\u00e1v. I komunista V. Nosek v rozhovoru s Hubertem Ripkou v prosinci 1942 se vyj\u00e1d\u0159il, \u017ee jde o n\u00e1rodn\u00ed boj proti N\u011bmecku&#8230; Pokud N\u011bmci nest\u0159\u00edl\u00ed na nacisty v Liberci, \u00dast\u00ed atd., nemohou a nesm\u011bj\u00ed kl\u00e1st podm\u00ednky a po\u017eadavky \u010ds. Vl\u00e1d\u011b.&quot; (64) Dom\u00e1c\u00ed odboj poukazoval na neexistenci antifa\u0161ismu u \u010desk\u00fdch N\u011bmc\u016f. I b\u00fdval\u00ed soci\u00e1ln\u011b demokrati\u010dt\u00ed N\u011bmci, pokud neemigrovali, jsou pr\u00fd ji\u017e ve slu\u017eb\u00e1ch nacist\u016f, a to i na vedouc\u00edch m\u00edstech, odkud pron\u00e1sleduj\u00ed \u010desk\u00fd n\u00e1rod. Opravoval se i zp\u011btn\u011b obraz n\u011bmeck\u00fdch odp\u016frc\u016f nacismu p\u0159ed Mnichovem. Jejich v\u011brnost v\u016f\u010di hostitelsk\u00e9 \u010cSR nebyla pr\u00fd up\u0159\u00edmn\u00e1, ale konjunktur\u00e1ln\u00ed a prosp\u011bch\u00e1\u0159sk\u00e1, nebo\u0165 vypl\u00fdvala pouze ze strachu p\u0159ed nacismem. (65)  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Jen ojedin\u011ble, a to je\u0161t\u011b \u00fa\u010delov\u011b, se na \u010deskoslovensk\u00e9 stran\u011b objevovaly n\u00e1zory o nutnosti systematick\u00e9 pr\u00e1ce mezi \u010desk\u00fdmi N\u011bmci. Nap\u0159. v tzv. memorandu J. Kally se doporu\u010duje p\u016fsoben\u00ed mezi sudetsk\u00fdmi N\u011bmci, aby \u201ese zabr\u00e1nilo duchovn\u00edmu slou\u010den\u00ed sudetsk\u00fdch N\u011bmc\u016f s \u0158\u00ed\u0161\u00ed&quot;. C\u00edlem by m\u011blo b\u00fdt dostat loaj\u00e1ln\u00ed \u010desk\u00e9 N\u011bmce do krvav\u00e9ho ozbrojen\u00e9ho boje s \u0159\u00ed\u0161sk\u00fdmi N\u011bmci, \u201enebo\u0165 jedin\u011b N\u011bmec m\u016f\u017ee v N\u011bmci zab\u00edt pangerm\u00e1na&#8230; My nezabijeme u N\u011bmc\u016f pangerm\u00e1nstv\u00ed, sp\u00ed\u0161 je sv\u00fdm n\u00e1siln\u00fdm postupem probud\u00edme a utvrd\u00edme.&quot; (66)  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Dal\u0161\u00ed negativn\u00ed zviditeln\u011bn\u00ed \u010desk\u00fdch N\u011bmc\u016f v protektor\u00e1tu upevnilo obraz sudetsk\u00e9ho N\u011bmce jako p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161n\u00edka p\u00e1t\u00e9 kolony, nevd\u011b\u010dn\u00e9ho p\u0159ivandroval\u00e9ho zr\u00e1dce,&quot; \u201epinsel\u00edka&quot;, potur\u010dence hor\u0161\u00edho Turka, pov\u00fd\u0161en\u00e9ho n\u00e1rodnostn\u00edho k\u0159\u00ed\u017eence, slep\u00e9ho exponenta III. \u0159\u00ed\u0161e, jen\u017e ve sv\u00e9 fanatick\u00e9 proti\u010desk\u00e9 z\u00e1\u0161ti po\u0161kozuje nejen \u010cechy, ale zaslepen\u011b i sebe sama. (67) Ji\u017e na po\u010d\u00e1tku druh\u00e9 sv\u011btov\u00e9 v\u00e1lky se v dom\u00e1c\u00edm odboji objevuj\u00ed prvn\u00ed n\u00e1vrhy na vyst\u011bhov\u00e1n\u00ed \u010desk\u00fdch N\u011bmc\u016f z \u010cSR. V t\u00e9to po\u010d\u00e1te\u010dn\u00ed f\u00e1zi je odsun zd\u016fvod\u0148ov\u00e1n i t\u00edm, \u017ee \u010de\u0161t\u00ed N\u011bmci jsou trvalou p\u0159ek\u00e1\u017ekou \u010desko-n\u011bmeck\u00e9ho sbl\u00ed\u017een\u00ed v budoucnosti. Brzy v\u0161ak p\u0159evl\u00e1dlo m\u00edn\u011bn\u00ed, \u017ee \u010de\u0161t\u00ed N\u011bmci jsou \u201ev\u0159edem&quot;, kter\u00fd je nutno odstranit. (68)<br \/> Do konce roku 1940, p\u0159es kyp\u00edc\u00ed vlnu obrann\u00e9ho protin\u011bmeck\u00e9ho nacionalismu, byla \u010d\u00e1st \u010desk\u00e9 spole\u010dnost\u00ed schopna ztoto\u017enit se se z\u00e1sadou \u201enen\u00ed N\u011bmec jako N\u011bmec.&quot; Nevybledl je\u0161t\u011b obraz N\u011bmce &#8211; antifa\u0161isty jako spolubojovn\u00edka proti nacismu.  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Nekomunistick\u00e1 levice v ileg\u00e1ln\u00edm \u010casopise ISNO (27. 6. 1939) spat\u0159ovala protinacistick\u00e9ho spojence v n\u011bmeck\u00fdch d\u011bln\u00edc\u00edch, \u010d\u00e1sti voj\u00e1k\u016f, katol\u00edk\u016f apod. Obdobn\u011b vydavatel ileg\u00e1ln\u00edho \u010cesk\u00e9ho kur\u00fdra Rostislav Kor\u010d\u00e1k upozor\u0148oval na mo\u017en\u00e9 spojenectv\u00ed s podzemn\u00ed aktivitou n\u011bmeck\u00e9ho, \u201eprost\u00e9ho, str\u00e1daj\u00edc\u00edho lidu&quot;. Tak\u00e9 soci\u00e1ln\u011b demokratick\u00fd ministr lond\u00fdnsk\u00e9 vl\u00e1dy Jarom\u00edr Ne\u010das apeloval na \u010cechy, aby se nedali strhnout protin\u011bmeckou pau\u0161alizuj\u00edc\u00ed vlnou. Upozor\u0148oval na to, \u017ee \u201emezi N\u011bmci je i mnoho antinacist\u016f&#8230; Kone\u010dn\u011b mus\u00edme po\u010d\u00edtat s t\u00edm, \u017ee budeme cht\u00edt m\u00edt jednou stabiln\u00ed slu\u0161n\u00e9 \u0159\u00e1dy pro v\u017edycky.&quot; (69)  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> D\u016fslednou diferenciaci mezi N\u011bmcem a nacistou propagoval ileg\u00e1ln\u00ed komunistick\u00fd tisk. Dodr\u017eoval tehdej\u0161\u00ed linii Komunistick\u00e9 internacion\u00e1ly, ozna\u010duj\u00edc\u00ed sv\u011btov\u00fd v\u00e1le\u010dn\u00fd konflikt za oboustrann\u011b imperialistick\u00fd, s v\u011bt\u0161\u00edm pod\u00edlem viny na francouzsko-britsk\u00e9 stran\u011b, a o\u010dek\u00e1vaj\u00edc\u00ed socialistickou revoluci v nacistick\u00e9m N\u011bmecku &#8211; \u201eobru na hlin\u011bn\u00fdch noh\u00e1ch&quot;. Obraz N\u011bmce nacisty je obrazem nep\u0159\u00edtele, otrok\u00e1\u0159e, lupi\u010de, vraha, utiskovatele, tyrana, gangstera, \u201ehroba\u0159e n\u011bmeck\u00e9ho n\u00e1roda a jeho nejvra\u017eedn\u011bj\u0161\u00edho nep\u0159\u00edtele.&quot; (70)<br \/> Komunist\u00e9 zd\u016fraz\u0148ovali, \u017ee \u201eHitlerova klika nen\u00ed n\u011bmeck\u00fd n\u00e1rod,&quot; jen\u017e m\u00e1 \u201epoctiv\u00e9 jm\u00e9no a pov\u011bst.&quot; N\u011bmeck\u00fd lid (d\u011bln\u00edci a rolnici) je n\u00e1rodem Liebknechta a Rosy Luxemburgov\u00e9,&quot; a z\u00e1rove\u0148 s rakousk\u00fdm lidem je nejbli\u017e\u0161\u00edm spojencem a bratrem \u010cech\u016f. Tento pracuj\u00edc\u00ed lid je t\u00e9\u017e \u201espoutan\u00fd a zotro\u010den\u00fd nacisty.&quot; V tomto duchu byl za \u010desk\u00e9ho spojence proti nacismu prohl\u00e1\u0161en i sudeton\u011bmeck\u00fd lid.&quot; (71) Pr\u00e1vo n\u00e1rod\u016f na sebeur\u010den\u00ed pro sudetsk\u00e9 N\u011bmce uzn\u00e1vali dom\u00e1c\u00ed komunist\u00e9 do roku 1941 a mnoz\u00ed d\u00e9le.  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Komunistick\u00e9 p\u0159ece\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed s\u00edly protifa\u0161istick\u00e9 n\u011bmeck\u00e9 revoluce a odboje odm\u00edtalo \u010ds. zahrani\u010dn\u00ed odboj okolo dr. E. Bene\u0161e. Odsuzovalo ho za boj po boku \u201eimperialistick\u00e9 Anglie&quot; a obvi\u0148ovalo exprezidenta za zan\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed \u201emorov\u00e9ho bacilu protin\u011bmeck\u00e9ho \u0161ovinismu&quot; do \u010desk\u00e9ho v\u011bdom\u00ed. (72)  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Komunistick\u00e9 sch\u00e9ma nebylo k E. Bene\u0161ovi objektivn\u00ed. Obraz N\u011bmce nespl\u00fdval E. Bene\u0161ovi pau\u0161\u00e1ln\u011b s obrazem nep\u0159\u00edtele. V prvn\u00edch letech v\u00e1lky ve vztahu k dom\u00e1c\u00edmu i zahrani\u010dn\u00edmu odboji opakoval ideu \u010desk\u00e9ho N\u011bmce jako \u010desk\u00e9ho spoluob\u010dana. Z doprovodn\u00e9ho koment\u00e1\u0159e J. Smutn\u00e9ho ke vzkazu E. Bene\u0161e dom\u016f z 21. 8. 1939 vypl\u00fdv\u00e1, \u017ee plo\u0161n\u00fd odsun N\u011bmc\u016f z obnoven\u00e9 \u010cSR pokl\u00e1dal exprezident tehdy je\u0161t\u011b za nere\u00e1ln\u00fd: \u201eChceme, aby v\u0161echno v republice bylo lep\u0161\u00ed, ne\u017eli v t\u00e9 star\u00e9, tedy i pom\u011br k N\u011bmc\u016fm.&quot; (73)  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Prvn\u00ed pl\u00e1ny E. Bene\u0161e na \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed ot\u00e1zky \u010desk\u00fdch N\u011bmc\u016f po v\u00e1lce po\u010d\u00edtaly pouze se zmen\u0161en\u00edm po\u010dtu n\u011bmeck\u00e9ho obyvatelstva odlou\u010den\u00edm n\u011bkter\u00fdch n\u011bmeck\u00fdch \u017eup od \u010cSR a n\u00e1slednou \u00fazemn\u00ed kompenzac\u00ed regiony s nen\u011bmeck\u00fdm obyvatelstvem. V projevu ve St\u00e1tn\u00ed rad\u011b 12. 11. 1942 konstatoval: \u201eNa na\u0161e N\u011bmce uplat\u0148uji v t\u00e9to v\u00e1lce stejn\u00e1 hlediska jako na v\u0161echny na\u0161e ob\u010dany ostatn\u00ed. N\u011bmci nacisti a N\u011bmci zr\u00e1dci budou a musej\u00ed b\u00fdt postaveni na tut\u00e9\u017e linii jako nacisti a zr\u00e1dci a dobrovoln\u00ed kolaboracionisti \u010de\u0161t\u00ed a sloven\u0161t\u00ed. N\u011bmci demokrati\u010dt\u00ed a v\u011brn\u00ed, kte\u0159\u00ed s n\u00e1mi z\u016fstali a kte\u0159\u00ed pak za v\u00e1lky s n\u00e1mi \u0161li, budou pokl\u00e1d\u00e1ni a jsou pokl\u00e1d\u00e1ni za pln\u00e9 a pr\u00e1voplatn\u00e9 na\u0161e ob\u010dany, s nimi\u017e jako takov\u00fdmi, tj. v\u011brn\u00fdmi ob\u010dany republiky, i v osvobozen\u00e9 republice m\u00e1 b\u00fdt po\u010d\u00edt\u00e1no a nakl\u00e1d\u00e1no&#8230; zast\u00e1v\u00e1m se ideje spolupr\u00e1ce s demokratick\u00fdmi a v\u011brn\u00fdmi na\u0161imi N\u011bmci zde v exilu&#8230; V\u0161echen pangermanismus a v\u0161echen nacismus mus\u00ed b\u00fdt mezi nimi (\u010desk\u00fdmi N\u011bmci &#8211; J. R.) definitivn\u011b a nemilosrdn\u00e9 zni\u010den&#8230; A \u010d\u00edm v\u00edce N\u011bmc\u016f samotn\u00fdch bude k tomu up\u0159\u00edmn\u011b s n\u00e1mi spolupracovat, t\u00edm l\u00e9pe pro n\u011b t\u00edm l\u00e9pe pro n\u00e1s.&quot; (74)  <\/p>\n<p> Pokra\u010dov\u00e1n\u00ed  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>N\u011bmeck\u00e1 okupace \u010desk\u00fdch zem\u00ed 15. 3. 1939 neb\u00fdval\u00e9 pos\u00edlila protin\u011bmeck\u00fd komponent nacionalismu \u010desk\u00e9ho obyvatelstva.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[8],"tags":[68],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=260"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=260"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=260"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=260"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}