{"id":43,"date":"2007-11-02T20:45:50","date_gmt":"2007-11-02T19:45:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/2007\/11\/02\/socialismus-a-poctivost\/"},"modified":"2007-11-02T20:45:50","modified_gmt":"2007-11-02T19:45:50","slug":"socialismus-a-poctivost","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/2007\/11\/02\/socialismus-a-poctivost\/","title":{"rendered":"Socialismus a poctivost"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kscm.cz\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\" alignleft size-full wp-image-42\" src=\"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/11\/kscm.gif\" border=\"0\" alt=\"kscm\" title=\"kscm\" hspace=\"5\" vspace=\"5\" width=\"55\" height=\"51\" align=\"left\" \/><\/a>Diskuse o dokumentu <em>Socialismus pro 21. stolet\u00ed<\/em> p\u0159ece jen trochu nabrala dech.  <\/p>\n<p> <!--more--> <\/p>\n<p> \u00a0 <\/p>\n<p> U\u017e vykrystalizovala ur\u010dit\u00e1 t\u00e9mata, kter\u00e1 se opakuj\u00ed na nejr\u016fzn\u011bj\u0161\u00edch \u00farovn\u00edch, kde je diskuse vedena, mj. i na str\u00e1nk\u00e1ch Hal\u00f3 novin. A\u010d jsem ji\u017e opakovan\u011b vyj\u00e1d\u0159il svoji ur\u010ditou nespokojenost s dokumentem, mus\u00edm na n\u011bkter\u00e9 zareagovat a br\u00e1nit ty, kdo na dokumentu pracovali.  <\/p>\n<p> Velice \u010dasto, nejnov\u011bji na diskusn\u00ed str\u00e1nce 26. \u0159\u00edjna, se objevuj\u00ed p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvky kritizuj\u00edc\u00ed dokument za to, \u017ee postr\u00e1d\u00e1 anal\u00fdzu minulosti. Nap\u0159. Rudolf Kar\u00e1sek p\u00ed\u0161e Jak by se asi tv\u00e1\u0159ili klasici marxismu-leninismu, kdyby se dozv\u011bd\u011bli, \u017ee n\u011bkdo, kdo se k nim hl\u00e1s\u00ed, vytv\u00e1\u0159\u00ed vizi budoucnosti bez anal\u00fdzy minulosti? Jako \u010dlen \u0159e\u0161itelsk\u00e9ho t\u00fdmu teoreticko-analytick\u00e9ho pracovi\u0161t\u011b (TAP) k ot\u00e1zk\u00e1m minulosti i jako autor, kter\u00fd ji\u017e v 90. letech k ot\u00e1zk\u00e1m minulosti zpracoval z\u00e1sadn\u00ed p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvek, nust\u00e1le vysv\u011btluji, \u017ee ot\u00e1zka za\u0159azen\u00ed \u010di neza\u0159azen\u00ed ot\u00e1zek minulosti do materi\u00e1lu nen\u00ed v\u011bc na\u0161\u00ed v\u011bdeck\u00e9 neschopnosti. Rozhodn\u011b nep\u0159istupujeme k projektu budoucnosti, ani\u017e bychom si ujasnili probl\u00e9my minulosti. P\u0159\u00edstupy k minulosti, sou\u010dasnosti i budoucnosti tvo\u0159\u00ed ned\u011bliteln\u00fd celek &#8211; jestli\u017ee n\u011bco pova\u017euji za vadu minul\u00e9ho syst\u00e9mu, pochopiteln\u011b na tom nestav\u00edm projekt budoucnosti. Kdo m\u00e1 z\u00e1jem o to, jak jsme tyto ot\u00e1zky \u0159e\u0161ili v minul\u00fdch letech i v pr\u016fb\u011bhu pr\u00e1ce na modelu, a\u0165 si vyhled\u00e1 na webov\u00fdch str\u00e1nk\u00e1ch KS\u010cM rubriku Na\u0161e politika\/Diskusn\u00ed projekt KS\u010cM &#8211; Socialismus pro 21. stolet\u00ed, p\u0159\u00edpadn\u011b Na\u0161e politika\/ Odborn\u00e9 z\u00e1zem\u00ed\/TAP\/Studie a vystoupen\u00ed. To, \u017ee se v textu dokumentu tato problematika objevuje jen velmi omezen\u011b a v podob\u011b jakou m\u00e1, je z\u00e1le\u017eitost\u00ed politick\u00e9ho rozhodnut\u00ed, kter\u00e9 se sna\u017e\u00ed naj\u00edt rozumn\u00fd kompromis mezi r\u016fzn\u00fdmi n\u00e1zory a nerozh\u00e1dat stranu .  <\/p>\n<p> Komu se zdaj\u00ed b\u00fdt tyto obavy p\u0159ehnan\u00e9, nech\u0165 se zamysl\u00ed nad polemikou Miloslava Ransdorfa a Miroslava Greben\u00ed\u010dka o ot\u00e1zk\u00e1ch kontinuity s minulost\u00ed. M. Ransdorf v \u010dl\u00e1nku Dialektika kontinuity a diskontinuity v Hal\u00f3 novin\u00e1ch 19.10. pouze zopakoval naprosto element\u00e1rn\u00ed marxistick\u00e9 pojet\u00ed t\u00e9to ot\u00e1zky, kter\u00e9 p\u0159irozen\u011b vid\u00ed v t\u00e9to dialektice jako ur\u010duj\u00edc\u00ed prvek moment diskontinuity, postupu kup\u0159edu. P\u0159ed Listopadem by nikoho z t\u011bch, kte\u0159\u00ed z\u00edskali alespo\u0148 z\u00e1kladn\u00ed znalosti marxismu, nenapadlo toto pojet\u00ed zpochybnit. A v p\u00e1tek 26.10. p\u00ed\u0161e M. Greben\u00ed\u010dek dlouh\u00fd a slo\u017eit\u011b za\u0161ifrovan\u00fd intelektu\u00e1lsk\u00fd \u010dl\u00e1nek, kter\u00fd Ransdorfovo pojet\u00ed fakticky kritizuje a klade d\u016fraz p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm na kontinuitu s minulost\u00ed. P\u0159elo\u017eeno do lid\u0161tiny konstatuje, \u017ee bychom vlastn\u011b nem\u011bli minulost p\u0159\u00edli\u0161 kritizovat a zejm\u00e9na ne m\u011bnit, proto\u017ee ona p\u0159ece m\u011bla \u0159adu dobr\u00fdch str\u00e1nek. To ale p\u0159ece nikdo nepop\u00edr\u00e1.  <\/p>\n<p> Jde v\u0161ak o to vyvodit ze srovn\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed dobr\u00fdch a \u0161patn\u00fdch str\u00e1nek z\u00e1v\u011br, \u017ee v dlouhodob\u00e9 perspektiv\u011b tohle auto m\u011blo mo\u017en\u00e1 hezk\u00e1 sedadla a blatn\u00edky, mo\u017en\u00e1 i zvuk klaksonu, ale ve srovn\u00e1n\u00ed s kapitalistick\u00fdm autem nejelo dost rychle a nakonec se zastavilo. A nebylo to jen proto, \u017ee m\u011blo kapitalistick\u00e9 auto v\u00fdvojov\u00fd n\u00e1skok, vyr\u00e1b\u011blo se ve vysp\u011blej\u0161\u00edch zem\u00edch a \u017ee do toho socialistick\u00e9ho auta po\u0159\u00e1d nar\u00e1\u017eelo kapitalistick\u00e9 auto, ale proto, \u017ee to socialistick\u00e9 auto nem\u011blo je\u0161t\u011b dost dobr\u00fd karbur\u00e1tor (dostate\u010dn\u011b spole\u010densk\u00e9 vlastnictv\u00ed, zapojen\u00ed pracuj\u00edc\u00edch do \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed, faktickou rovnost r\u016fzn\u00fdch t\u0159\u00edd a skupin), a a\u017e zkonstruujeme nov\u00fd typ, bude muset m\u00edt karbur\u00e1tor jin\u00fd.  <\/p>\n<p> Jde o tohle a o nic jin\u00e9ho. Bohu\u017eel \u0159ada na\u0161ich \u010dlen\u016f a sympatizant\u016f, znechucen\u00fdch pau\u0161\u00e1ln\u00edmi \u00fatoky na socialismus a znehodnocov\u00e1n\u00edm sv\u00e9 celo\u017eivotn\u00ed pr\u00e1ce, do\u0161la k sv\u00e9r\u00e1zn\u00e9mu obran\u00e1\u0159sk\u00e9mu n\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00ed a neradi sly\u0161\u00ed i skute\u010dn\u011b solidn\u00ed, marxistickou, i kdy\u017e kritickou anal\u00fdzu t\u00e9to prvn\u00ed formy. Dokonce jsou \u010dasto alergi\u010dt\u00ed i na slova jako modernizace nebo nov\u00fd za\u010d\u00e1tek , kter\u00e1 si naprosto chybn\u011b vykl\u00e1daj\u00ed jako znehodnocen\u00ed minulosti. O to v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed odpov\u011bdnost by m\u011bli m\u00edt zku\u0161en\u00ed politici a nesna\u017eit se nasb\u00edrat politick\u00e9 body t\u00edm, \u017ee t\u011bmto n\u00e1lad\u00e1m budou nahr\u00e1vat.  <\/p>\n<p> Nejsem s\u00e1m, kdo za v\u016fbec nejhor\u0161\u00ed pova\u017euje p\u0159\u00edstup, kdy n\u011bkte\u0159\u00ed auto\u0159i vytrvale nazna\u010duj\u00ed, \u017ee jen oni p\u0159istupuj\u00ed k probl\u00e9m\u016fm v\u011bdecky a poctiv\u011b, zat\u00edmco n\u00e1zory jejich oponent\u016f jsou subjektivistick\u00e9 nebo n\u011bjak\u00fdm zp\u016fsobem nepoctiv\u00e9 a odbyt\u00e9. Proto\u017ee v\u00edm, jak poctiv\u011b a usilovn\u011b pracovali v\u0161ichni \u010dlenov\u00e9 \u0159e\u0161itelsk\u00fdch t\u00fdm\u016f nad sjezdov\u00fdm \u00fakolem zpracovat model socialismu a jak v\u011bdecky poctiv\u00fd je nap\u0159. M. Ransdorf, tak mne tyto r\u016fzn\u00e9 skryt\u00e9 insinuace velmi znepokojuj\u00ed. Mysl\u00edm si toti\u017e, \u017ee v diskusi mezi komunisty by se v\u016fbec nem\u011bly objevit.  <\/p>\n<p> Josef HELLER, Teoreticko-analytick\u00e9\u00a0pracovi\u0161t\u011b \u00daV KS\u010cM  <\/p>\n<p> Hal\u00f3 noviny, 2. listopadu 2007  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Diskuse o dokumentu Socialismus pro 21. stolet\u00ed p\u0159ece jen trochu nabrala dech.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":42,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[5],"tags":[12,13],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/42"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}