{"id":692,"date":"2007-08-10T11:31:51","date_gmt":"2007-08-10T09:31:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/2007\/08\/10\/90-let-ijnove-revoluce-11\/"},"modified":"2007-08-10T11:31:51","modified_gmt":"2007-08-10T09:31:51","slug":"90-let-ijnove-revoluce-11","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/2007\/08\/10\/90-let-ijnove-revoluce-11\/","title":{"rendered":"90. let \u0158\u00edjnov\u00e9 revoluce (11)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <img loading=\"lazy\" class=\" alignleft size-full wp-image-3\" src=\"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/10\/logo.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"logo\" title=\"logo\" hspace=\"5\" vspace=\"5\" width=\"100\" height=\"65\" align=\"left\" \/>Ozbrojen\u00e9 povst\u00e1n\u00ed nebylo spiknut\u00edm. Lenin to p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010div\u011b dok\u00e1zal. Podle n\u011bho m\u011bla povst\u00e1n\u00ed p\u0159ipravit strana pokrokov\u00e9 t\u0159\u00eddy za co nej\u0161ir\u0161\u00ed \u00fa\u010dasti pracuj\u00edc\u00edch na uchopen\u00ed moci. A potom u\u017e m\u011bla b\u00fdt tato moc p\u0159ed\u00e1na II. sjezdu sov\u011bt\u016f.  <\/p>\n<p> <!--more--> <\/p>\n<p> Oddalov\u00e1n\u00ed term\u00ednu povst\u00e1n\u00ed hrozilo krachem revoluce. Tak\u00e9 vy\u010dk\u00e1vac\u00ed linie, pokud \u0161lo o sjezd sov\u011bt\u016f, byla smrteln\u00fdm nebezpe\u010d\u00edm. Velen\u00ed arm\u00e1dy a kadeti chystali \u00fader na revolu\u010dn\u00ed s\u00edly a krvavou \u0159e\u017e pracuj\u00edc\u00edch.  Lenin pe\u010dliv\u011b rozeb\u00edr\u00e1 stav revolu\u010dn\u00edch a kontrarevolu\u010dn\u00edch sil, hloubku celon\u00e1rodn\u00ed krize a rozhoduje, \u017ee ot\u00e1let s povst\u00e1n\u00edm je zlo\u010din.  <\/p>\n<p> Zde je t\u0159eba znovu p\u0159ipomenout zvl\u00e1\u0161tn\u00ed postoj Stalina. Dal by se ur\u010dit jako centristick\u00fd. Stalin nevystupoval p\u0159\u00edmo proti Leninov\u011b linii, ale neodsuzoval ani stanovisko Kamen\u011bva a Zinovjeva, kte\u0159\u00ed hlasovali proti rozhodnuti o povst\u00e1n\u00ed, ani v praxi uskute\u010d\u0148ovanou linii Trock\u00e9ho, sm\u011b\u0159uj\u00edc\u00ed k oddalov\u00e1n\u00ed povst\u00e1n\u00ed do sjezdu sov\u011bt\u016f. Pro\u010d se zde Stalin sna\u017eil vystupovat jako rozhod\u010d\u00ed? To je t\u0159eba je\u0161t\u011b pochopit.  <\/p>\n<p> P\u0159i ve\u0161ker\u00e9m kol\u00eds\u00e1n\u00ed se Stalin v nejd\u016fle\u017eit\u011bj\u0161\u00edch okam\u017eic\u00edch p\u0159ikl\u00e1n\u011bl, pokud \u0161lo o dobu povst\u00e1n\u00ed a hodnocen\u00ed ud\u00e1lost\u00ed roku 1917, ke stanovisku Trock\u00e9ho.  <\/p>\n<p> Uve\u010fme v\u00fdmluvn\u00e9 Stalinovo p\u0159izn\u00e1n\u00ed z roku 1920: &quot;Bez ohledu na v\u0161echny Ilji\u010dovy po\u017eadavky jsme ho neposlechli a \u0161li jsme d\u00e1le cestou upev\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed sov\u011bt\u016f, a\u017e jsme dosp\u011bli ke sjezdu sov\u011bt\u016f 25. \u0159\u00edjna a k \u00fasp\u011b\u0161n\u00e9mu povst\u00e1n\u00ed.&quot; V t\u011bchto slovech je jasn\u011b vid\u011bt souhlas se stanoviskem Trock\u00e9ho. Samoz\u0159ejm\u011b, \u017ee Stalin nebyl s\u00e1m, kdo &quot;neuposlechl&quot; Lenina. Stalin v\u0161ak byl mezi nimi.  <\/p>\n<p> Lenin, kter\u00fd vid\u011bl r\u016fzn\u00e1 kol\u00eds\u00e1n\u00ed i nebezpe\u010d\u00ed odlo\u017een\u00ed povst\u00e1n\u00ed, bil na poplach: &quot;Ot\u00e1len\u00ed se rovn\u00e1 smrti.&quot;  <\/p>\n<p> Lenin vid\u011bl v t\u011bchto pr\u016ftaz\u00edch obrovsk\u00e9 nebezpe\u010d\u00ed pro revoluci, kter\u00e1 dosp\u011bla ke sv\u00e9mu rozhoduj\u00edc\u00edmu mezn\u00edku, nebezpe\u010d\u00ed, \u017ee bude prome\u0161k\u00e1na historick\u00e1 p\u0159\u00edle\u017eitost k v\u00edt\u011bzstv\u00ed na mohutn\u00e9 vln\u011b revolu\u010dn\u00edho nad\u0161en\u00ed a za p\u0159\u00edzniv\u00e9 mezin\u00e1rodn\u00ed situace.  <\/p>\n<p> V diskus\u00edch o p\u0159\u00edprav\u011b \u0158\u00edjnov\u00e9ho ozbrojen\u00e9ho povst\u00e1n\u00ed se pom\u011brn\u011b jasn\u011b uk\u00e1zalo takov\u00e9 &quot;b\u00edl\u00e9 m\u00edsto&quot;, jako protich\u016fdn\u00fd p\u0159\u00edstup k hodnocen\u00ed procesu prosazov\u00e1n\u00ed Leninova stanoviska k ot\u00e1zce ozbrojen\u00e9ho povst\u00e1n\u00ed v \u00daV strany, tedy procesu p\u0159ekon\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed kol\u00eds\u00e1n\u00ed mezi vedouc\u00edmi \u010diniteli strany. Jde o charakteristiku r\u016fzn\u00fdch stanovisek \u010dlen\u016f \u00daV k ot\u00e1zce praktick\u00e9 p\u0159\u00edpravy povst\u00e1n\u00ed, volby vhodn\u00e9ho okam\u017eiku a tak\u00e9 ur\u010den\u00ed temp a charakteru v\u00fdvoje rozhoduj\u00edc\u00ed bitvy, kterou nastolil na po\u0159ad jedn\u00e1n\u00ed Lenin.  <\/p>\n<p> Je t\u0159eba si v\u0161imnout, \u017ee pokud jde o povst\u00e1n\u00ed, dosud je\u0161t\u011b plat\u00ed tendence stav\u011bt Lenina do opozice proti \u00fast\u0159edn\u00edmu v\u00fdboru strany a naz\u00fdvat ty, kte\u0159\u00ed nep\u0159ijali bezv\u00fdhradn\u011b Leninovo hledisko, antileninovci a odp\u016frci povst\u00e1n\u00ed. Pokud jde o n\u00e1zorov\u00e9 rozd\u00edly, je t\u0159eba p\u0159esn\u011b charakterizovat stanoviska ka\u017ed\u00e9ho \u010dlena \u00daV v z\u00e1\u0159\u00ed a \u0159\u00edjnu 1917 k ot\u00e1zce povst\u00e1n\u00ed. Zde se dosud pom\u011brn\u011b siln\u011b projevuje stereotyp hodnocen\u00ed, vych\u00e1zej\u00edc\u00ed ze Stru\u010dn\u00fdch d\u011bjin VKS(b). Jde o kvalifikaci hledisek, n\u00e1zor\u016f a stanovisek, o hodnocen\u00ed diskus\u00ed t\u00fdkaj\u00edc\u00edch se ot\u00e1zky ozbrojen\u00e9ho povst\u00e1n\u00ed. Zd\u00e1 se n\u00e1m, \u017ee je zapot\u0159eb\u00ed prov\u00e9st zvl\u00e1\u0161t\u011b pe\u010dliv\u00fd v\u011bdeck\u00fd rozbor v z\u00e1jmu obnoven\u00ed historick\u00e9 pravdy, objektivn\u00edho pod\u00e1n\u00ed norem stranick\u00e9ho \u017eivota a stylu vz\u00e1jemn\u00fdch vztah\u016f mezi \u010dleny strany, charakteristick\u00fdch pro tuto dobu.  <\/p>\n<p> Pokra\u010dov\u00e1n\u00ed  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ozbrojen\u00e9 povst\u00e1n\u00ed nebylo spiknut\u00edm. Lenin to p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010div\u011b dok\u00e1zal. Podle n\u011bho m\u011bla povst\u00e1n\u00ed p\u0159ipravit strana pokrokov\u00e9 t\u0159\u00eddy za co nej\u0161ir\u0161\u00ed \u00fa\u010dasti<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[8],"tags":[108],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/692"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=692"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/692\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=692"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=692"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=692"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}