{"id":949,"date":"2010-05-04T14:53:58","date_gmt":"2010-05-04T12:53:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/2010\/05\/04\/nekiujeme-nadji-v-novy-socialismus\/"},"modified":"2010-05-04T14:53:58","modified_gmt":"2010-05-04T12:53:58","slug":"nekiujeme-nadji-v-novy-socialismus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/2010\/05\/04\/nekiujeme-nadji-v-novy-socialismus\/","title":{"rendered":"Nek\u0159i\u017eujeme nad\u011bji v nov\u00fd socialismus?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"obrys\"<\/a>Pe\u010dliv\u00fd \u010dten\u00e1\u0159 Obrysu-Kmene m\u00e1 jist\u011b je\u0161t\u011b v \u017eiv\u00e9 pam\u011bti \u010dl\u00e1nek Jaroslava Ku\u010dery Tajn\u00fd pl\u00e1n uk\u0159i\u017eov\u00e1n\u00ed socialismu?, oti\u0161t\u011bn\u00fd v \u010d. 12 O-K ze dne 20. 3. 2010. Kdy\u017e pro nic jin\u00e9ho, tak pro exkluzivn\u00ed, autora z\u00e1padn\u00ed thrillerov\u00e9 literatury hodn\u00fd obr\u00e1zek hluboce zakonspirovan\u00e9 skupiny v r\u00e1mci sov\u011btsk\u00fdch vl\u00e1dn\u00edch struktur, krok za krokem realizuj\u00edc\u00ed projekt likvidace socialismu ve sv\u011bt\u011b. <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\u00a0V literatu\u0159e podobn\u00e9ho druhu se pro tento projekt u\u017e\u00edv\u00e1 pojmu, kter\u00e9ho se dotkl i J. Ku\u010dera, toti\u017e \u201eOperace Golgota\u201c. Mimochodem, tady mus\u00edm autora opravit \u2013 podle n\u011bj byly c\u00edlem t\u00e9to operace v podstat\u011b sobeck\u00e9, parazitn\u00ed z\u00e1jmy \u010d\u00e1sti sov\u011btsk\u00e9 elity a kapitalismus byl zam\u00fd\u0161len\u00e1 kone\u010dn\u00e1 stanice. Podle jin\u00e9ho \u010dl\u00e1nku, kter\u00fd jsem \u010detl zase j\u00e1 (nev\u00edm u\u017e kde \u2013 podobn\u00e9 hlouposti si nezaznamen\u00e1v\u00e1m), byl j\u00e1drem pl\u00e1nu Andropov\u016fv n\u00e1pad nechat proj\u00edt sov\u011btsk\u00fd lid Golgotou do\u010dasn\u00e9 rekapitalizace, aby si zase za\u010dal v\u00e1\u017eit socialismu. Kdyby to bylo pravda, tak by z\u0159ejm\u011b musel b\u00fdt Andropov nemocen daleko v\u00edce, ne\u017e jako to prezentuj\u00ed seri\u00f3zn\u00ed zdroje, co\u017e ov\u0161em nep\u0159edpokl\u00e1d\u00e1m. Osobn\u011b pova\u017euji Andropova za bystr\u00fd mozek a zku\u0161en\u00e9ho mocip\u00e1na, kter\u00fd pochopil bezv\u00fdchodnost v\u00fdvoje prvn\u00ed formy socialismu \u2013 protosocialismu (samoz\u0159ejm\u011b bez pat\u0159i\u010dn\u00e9 teoretick\u00e9 v\u00fdbavy) a sna\u017eil se s t\u00edm n\u011bco ud\u011blat. Mo\u017en\u00e1 jen zachr\u00e1nit velikost rusk\u00e9 velmoci \u2013 kdo v\u00ed? <\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Ale te\u010f k v\u00e1\u017en\u011bj\u0161\u00edm v\u011bcem. Mus\u00edm se p\u0159iznat, \u017ee j\u00e1 jsem ten \u201ekoryfej t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 ve\u0161ker\u00e9 teorie\u201c (viz \u010dl\u00e1nek), kter\u00fd p\u0159i diskusi na semin\u00e1\u0159i obvinil Ku\u010deru z pu\u010distick\u00e9ho pojet\u00ed d\u011bjin a nafoukan\u011b ho pou\u010dil, \u017ee je to \u201enemarxistick\u00fd p\u0159\u00edstup, nebo\u0165 d\u011bjiny nevytv\u00e1\u0159ej\u00ed \u0161pioni, ale lidov\u00e9 masy. Amen\u201c. K tomuto pou\u010den\u00ed se hrd\u011b hl\u00e1s\u00edm a nem\u00e1m, co bych k tomu dodal. <\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Autor mne v\u0161ak p\u0159\u00edjemn\u011b p\u0159ekvapil. Zat\u00edmco tehdy \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 syst\u00e9mov\u00e9 p\u0159\u00ed\u010diny z\u00e1niku minul\u00e9ho syst\u00e9mu neuzn\u00e1val (pokud v\u00edm, tak i dnes p\u00ed\u0161e o pouh\u00e9 \u201estruktur\u00e1ln\u00ed krizi\u201c vypl\u00fdvaj\u00edc\u00ed p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm ze zm\u011bn ve v\u00fdrobn\u00edch sil\u00e1ch), ve zm\u00edn\u011bn\u00e9m \u010dl\u00e1nku dokonce stav\u00ed \u00falohu lidov\u00fdch mas a z\u00e1kladn\u00edch syst\u00e9mov\u00fdch faktor\u016f, jako je p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm vlastnictv\u00ed v\u00fdrobn\u00edch prost\u0159edk\u016f a z\u00e1jmy t\u0159\u00edd, alespo\u0148 vedle sebe. P\u00ed\u0161e, \u017ee to \u201epu\u010distick\u00e9\u201c pojet\u00ed a pojet\u00ed syst\u00e9mov\u00fdch vad, tedy \u00falohy \u0161pion\u016f a lidov\u00fdch mas, se nevylu\u010duj\u00ed, ale dopl\u0148uj\u00ed. Bravo, Jardo, to je v\u00fdznamn\u00fd pokrok. Ale mn\u011b to nesta\u010d\u00ed \u2013 pokud v\u00edm, tak kladen\u00ed vedle sebe faktor\u016f se zcela odli\u0161nou vahou a v\u00fdznamem se obecn\u011b \u0159\u00edk\u00e1 eklekticismus a ten byl Marxovi hluboce ciz\u00ed. Je to jako kdybych \u0159ekl, \u017ee prvn\u00ed sv\u011btov\u00e1 v\u00e1lka vypukla jak kv\u016fli tomu, \u017ee imperialistick\u00e9 mocnosti a kapit\u00e1l m\u011bly sv\u00e9 rozporn\u00e9 z\u00e1jmy, tak pro to, \u017ee n\u00e1m \u201ezabili Ferdinanda\u201c. <\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Nic nenam\u00edt\u00e1m proti t\u011bm pas\u00e1\u017e\u00edm Jardova textu, kde objas\u0148uje, \u017ee krom\u011b syst\u00e9mov\u00fdch vad protosocialismu byly i chyby subjektivn\u00ed, \u0161patn\u00e1 politika sov\u011btsk\u00e9ho veden\u00ed, zejm\u00e9na Chru\u0161\u010dova (Pod Stalinem by snad lid\u00e9 pracovali v\u00edc a c\u00edtili se v\u00edce hospod\u00e1\u0159i a vl\u00e1dci ve sv\u00e9 zemi? Nebo by se v\u00edce b\u00e1li gulag\u016f?), mezin\u00e1rodn\u00ed tlaky apod. Marxista ov\u0161em nam\u00edtne, \u017ee se za t\u011bmito zd\u00e1nliv\u011b subjektivn\u00edmi p\u0159\u00ed\u010dinami skr\u00fdvaly ve skute\u010dnosti omezen\u00e9 z\u00e1jmy r\u016fzn\u00fdch skupin vl\u00e1dnouc\u00ed t\u0159\u00eddy \u0159\u00edd\u00edc\u00edho apar\u00e1tu a jej\u00edch politick\u00fdch a mocensk\u00fdch lobby, odli\u0161uj\u00edc\u00ed se od skute\u010dn\u00fdch z\u00e1jm\u016f \u0161irok\u00fdch neprivilegovan\u00fdch vrstev, zejm\u00e9na d\u011blnick\u00e9 t\u0159\u00eddy. A po tomto konstatov\u00e1n\u00ed se u\u017e p\u0159\u00edmo derou na rty ot\u00e1zky: Kde se tyto z\u00e1jmy vzaly? Z jak\u00e9 struktury vlastnick\u00fdch vztah\u016f vypl\u00fdvaly? Pro\u010d byla t\u0159\u00edda \u0159\u00edd\u00edc\u00edho apar\u00e1tu skute\u010dn\u011b t\u0159\u00eddou? Pro\u010d syst\u00e9m nem\u011bl korek\u010dn\u00ed mechanismy? atd. atd. <\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Tyhle ot\u00e1zky Jardu Ku\u010deru netr\u00e1p\u00ed. \u201eBez ucelen\u00e9 konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed anal\u00fdzy, jak a v jak\u00fdch vnit\u0159n\u00edch i mezin\u00e1rodn\u00edch souvislostech se prohra socialismu od onoho syst\u00e9mov\u00e9ho selh\u00e1n\u00ed odv\u00edjela, nelze toto selh\u00e1n\u00ed jako jej\u00ed z\u00e1kladn\u00ed p\u0159\u00ed\u010dinu pova\u017eovat za prok\u00e1zan\u00e9. Bez n\u00ed je jen pouhou abstrakc\u00ed, jej\u00ed\u017e absolutizace ji u\u017e m\u011bn\u00ed v nov\u00e9 dogma, br\u00e1n\u00edc\u00ed jin\u00fdm \u00fahl\u016fm pohledu.\u201c Bum, b\u00e1c \u2013 \u0161\u00eddlo je z pytle venku. <\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Ji\u017e drahn\u011b let se spolu s dal\u0161\u00edmi p\u0159\u00e1teli tu anal\u00fdzu syst\u00e9mov\u00fdch vad, po kter\u00e9 Jarda Ku\u010dera vol\u00e1, pokou\u0161\u00edme prezentovat (viz nap\u0159. na\u0161e kniha \u2013 Heller, Neu\u017eil a kol. \u2013 Boj\u00edte se socialismu?, k dost\u00e1n\u00ed v prodejn\u011b Futury). Pochopiteln\u011b p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm na p\u016fd\u011b strany, proto\u017ee ofici\u00e1ln\u00ed, pravic\u00ed kontrolovan\u00e9 cesty informov\u00e1n\u00ed ve\u0159ejnosti jsou pro na\u0161e pojet\u00ed nepr\u016fchodn\u00e9. (Na\u0161e kniha se do ofici\u00e1ln\u00ed distribuce nedostala). Bohu\u017eel, po t\u011bch mnoha letech mus\u00edm konstatovat, \u017ee nepr\u016fchodn\u00e9 jsou pro na\u0161e pojet\u00ed i cesty \u201estranick\u00e9\u201c. Nemohu se rozhodn\u011b sm\u00ed\u0159it s t\u00edm, \u017ee projev m\u00edstop\u0159edsedy Grospi\u010de k v\u00fdro\u010d\u00ed 17. listopadu, kdy byla kr\u00e1sn\u00e1 p\u0159\u00edle\u017eitost prezentovat antikomunist\u016fm, v \u010dem jsme se marxisticky pou\u010dili a vyrazit jim z ruky \u0159adu argument\u016f, byl ze zna\u010dn\u00e9 \u010d\u00e1sti v\u00fdkladem pr\u00e1v\u011b onoho zm\u00edn\u011bn\u00e9ho \u201epu\u010distick\u00e9ho\u201c pojet\u00ed, kter\u00e9 se tak l\u00edb\u00ed J. Ku\u010derovi. \u0160koda promarn\u011bn\u00e9 p\u0159\u00edle\u017eitosti, tak jako je \u0161koda, \u017ee pod politick\u00fdmi tlaky nebyl do dokumentu p\u0159edlo\u017een\u00e9ho VII. sjezdu KS\u010cM za\u0159azen alespo\u0148 pokus o anal\u00fdzu minulosti. St\u00e1le t\u00e1\u017e obava veden\u00ed strany z vnitrostranick\u00e9ho konfliktu, ze kter\u00e9 tak vydatn\u011b \u010derp\u00e1 antikomunismus nebo p\u0159ed\u00e1ci \u010cSSD, od\u016fvod\u0148uj\u00edc\u00ed bohum\u00ednsk\u00e9 usnesen\u00ed. Anal\u00fdza by tedy byla, jen ji cht\u00edt sly\u0161et a diskutovat o jej\u00edch argumenta\u010dn\u00edch okruz\u00edch, kter\u00e9 Jarda Ku\u010dera dob\u0159e zn\u00e1, ale rad\u011bji se \u201e\u0148ah\u0148\u00e1\u201c v dum\u00e1n\u00ed nad t\u00edm, kdo s k\u00fdm a za \u010d\u00edmi z\u00e1dy co dohodnul. <\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Samoz\u0159ejm\u011b netvrd\u00edm, \u017ee ty faktory, kter\u00e9 Ku\u010dera popisuje, nep\u016fsobily. Je de facto pomluvou (za tento h\u0159\u00edch d\u00e1v\u00e1m Jardovi rozh\u0159e\u0161en\u00ed), kdy\u017e J. Ku\u010dera tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee my, stoupenci teorie syst\u00e9mov\u00fdch p\u0159\u00ed\u010din jako rozhoduj\u00edc\u00edch, redukujeme cel\u00fd proces dialektick\u00e9ho ovliv\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed sf\u00e9r spole\u010densk\u00e9ho \u017eivota a zprost\u0159edkov\u00e1n\u00ed objektivn\u00edho subjektivn\u00edm, jen na n\u011bjak\u00e9 jednosm\u011brn\u00e9 p\u016fsoben\u00ed dejme tomu ekonomicko-vlastnick\u00fdch proces\u016f. My pouze konstatujeme, \u017ee v cel\u00e9m tomto zprost\u0159edkov\u00e1n\u00ed odrazu proces\u016f nedokonal\u00e9ho zespole\u010den\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed v\u00fdroby za protosocialismu a\u017e do hlav a jedn\u00e1n\u00ed politick\u00fdch \u0161pi\u010dek vl\u00e1dnouc\u00ed t\u0159\u00eddy \u0159\u00edd\u00edc\u00edho apar\u00e1tu m\u00e1 to \u201ezr\u00e1dcovstv\u00ed Gorba\u010dova \u010di Andropova\u201c a \u201epu\u010dismus tajn\u00fdch slu\u017eeb\u201c velmi odvozenou a determinovanou, i kdy\u017e jist\u011b aktivn\u00ed roli. Zjednodu\u0161en\u011b \u0159e\u010deno \u2013 sov\u011bt\u0161t\u00ed a po nich i n\u011bkte\u0159\u00ed na\u0161i papal\u00e1\u0161i by neza\u010dali spekulovat o v\u00fdchodisku z krize (alespo\u0148 pro sebe), kdyby ta krize tkv\u00edc\u00ed hluboce v neefektivnosti ekonomick\u00e9ho mechanismu protosocialismu a omezen\u00fdch z\u00e1jmech privilegovan\u00fdch vrstev (J. Ku\u010dera se o nich dokonce zmi\u0148uje) nebyla. Jestli\u017ee zrazuje car, pak je cel\u00e1 \u0159\u00ed\u0161e prohnil\u00e1, to dob\u0159e v\u00edme z marxisticky poj\u00edman\u00fdch d\u011bjin. Nic v\u00edc a nic m\u00e9n\u011b \u0159\u00edci nechceme. <\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Jarda Ku\u010dera celkem spr\u00e1vn\u011b p\u0159ipom\u00edn\u00e1, \u017ee vlastn\u00ed vypuknut\u00ed politick\u00e9 krize m\u00edv\u00e1 sv\u00e9 specifick\u00e9 p\u0159\u00ed\u010diny, kter\u00e9 zdaleka nelze p\u0159\u00edmo odvodit od podstatn\u00fdch syst\u00e9mov\u00fdch charakteristik \u2013 ano, tyto p\u0159\u00ed\u010diny mohou rozhodnout o tom, kdy politick\u00e1 krize nastane, zda to je\u0161t\u011b p\u00e1r let vydr\u017e\u00ed nebo ne, zda to bude na 17. listopadu nebo n\u011bkdy v prosinci, jak\u00fdmi konkr\u00e9tn\u00edmi formami se bude \u0159e\u0161it (zda sametovou revoluc\u00ed nebo n\u00e1m\u011bst\u00edm Tchien an men a po n\u011bm n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00ed rekapitalizac\u00ed pod veden\u00edm Komunistick\u00e9 strany), zda bude st\u00e1t v \u010dele Miroslav \u0160t\u011bp\u00e1n nebo Ladislav Adamec apod. <\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Ot\u00e1zka ale zn\u00ed \u2013 opravdu jsou pro n\u00e1s tyhle detaily dnes tolik d\u016fle\u017eit\u00e9? Samoz\u0159ejm\u011b \u2013 m\u00e1-li J. Ku\u010dera i jin\u00ed o tyto v\u011bci z\u00e1jem \u2013 n\u011bkdo vdolky, jin\u00fd holky – nech\u0165 si b\u00e1daj\u00ed i v t\u011bchto ot\u00e1zk\u00e1ch, ale pro z\u00e1jmy \u0161irok\u00fdch neprivilegovan\u00fdch mas, kter\u00e9 pro\u0161ly Golgotou rekapitalizace a nevid\u00ed dnes \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 v\u00fdchodisko ze sv\u00e9 tristn\u00ed situace, p\u0159itom se ov\u0161em boj\u00ed n\u00e1vratu n\u011bkter\u00fdch negativn\u00edch atribut\u016f minul\u00e9ho syst\u00e9mu a i pod vlivem antikomunistick\u00e9 propagandy pohl\u00ed\u017eej\u00ed na komunisty trochu s nad\u011bj\u00ed, ale je\u0161t\u011b hodn\u011b s obavou, je d\u016fle\u017eit\u00e9 n\u011bco jin\u00e9ho. D\u016fle\u017eit\u00e9 je, aby jim strana jasn\u011b a srozumiteln\u011b, bez kli\u010dek a vyt\u00e1\u010dek, \u0159ekla, \u017ee minul\u00fd syst\u00e9m m\u011bl sv\u00e9 historick\u00e9 meze a syst\u00e9mov\u00e9 vady, kter\u00e9 spo\u010d\u00edvaly v tom a v tom a v tom a nelze se k n\u011bmu proto vr\u00e1tit a daj\u00ed se napravit t\u00edm a t\u00edm a t\u00edm. To bohu\u017eel dnes KS\u010cM ned\u011bl\u00e1, pod vlivem lid\u00ed uva\u017euj\u00edc\u00edch jako J. Ku\u010dera a sna\u017e\u00edc\u00edch se sp\u00ed\u0161e ospravedlnit svou \u010dinnost v minulosti a dok\u00e1zat, \u017ee jen ten minul\u00fd syst\u00e9m byl skute\u010dn\u011b socialismem a padl jen d\u00edky r\u016fzn\u00fdm kejkl\u016fm a pikl\u016fm \u0161pion\u016f nebo, jak jsem taky jednou sly\u0161el, proto, \u017ee si d\u011bln\u00edci nev\u00e1\u017eili socialismu a zradili KS\u010c \u2013 zkr\u00e1tka, \u017ee oni nic, oni byli muzikanti. <\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 A proto jsem zase musel pozvednout sv\u016fj mnoha lidem ve stran\u011b nep\u0159\u00edjemn\u00fd hlas a o lec\u010dems \u201epou\u010dit\u201c J. Ku\u010deru a jeho boys and girls. <\/p>\n

Autor: JOSEF HELLER <\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.obrys-kmen.cz\/index.php?rok=2010&cis=17&cl=01<\/a> <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Pe\u010dliv\u00fd \u010dten\u00e1\u0159 Obrysu-Kmene m\u00e1 jist\u011b je\u0161t\u011b v \u017eiv\u00e9 pam\u011bti \u010dl\u00e1nek Jaroslava Ku\u010dery Tajn\u00fd pl\u00e1n uk\u0159i\u017eov\u00e1n\u00ed socialismu?, oti\u0161t\u011bn\u00fd v \u010d. 12<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":307,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[5],"tags":[13],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/949"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=949"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/949\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/307"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=949"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=949"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/novysmer.cz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=949"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}